Skip to content
Shivacha — Simplifying Tech Solutions
Shivacha Web3Web3 Security Engineering

Web3 Threat Modeling

Structured threat modelling for Web3 systems — assets, adversaries, attack paths and prioritised mitigations.

Security controls · production
Illustrative
  1. Identity

    SSOMFAPasskeys
  2. Access control

    RBACLeast privilegeJust-in-time
  3. Secrets

    VaultRotationNo secrets in code
  4. Encryption

    TLS in transitEncrypted at rest
  5. Monitoring

    Audit logAlertsThreat detection

Audit events

  • login.mfa.success

    user · passkey

  • role.granted

    approved by 2nd admin

  • secret.rotated

    db-credentials

  • anomaly.flagged

    unusual geo → ticket

Overview

Threat modelling systematically identifies what can go wrong: assets at risk, adversaries and their capabilities, attack paths across contracts, keys, infrastructure, oracles and governance, and mitigations. We run threat modelling workshops and produce models that guide design decisions, testing priorities and audit scope.

Common use cases

  • New protocol designThreat model before implementation.
  • Audit scopingFocusing audits on highest risks.
  • Governance riskAssessing governance attack scenarios.
  • Integration riskRisks from external dependencies.

Quick answers

Web3 Threat Modeling at a glance

The essentials in brief. Every project is scoped individually — ask us for specifics.

What is Web3 threat modeling?
Structured threat modelling for Web3 systems — assets, adversaries, attack paths and prioritised mitigations.
Who is it for?
Typically Web3 startups, fintechs adding digital assets, and institutions exploring tokenization, stablecoins or on-chain settlement.
What does Shivacha provide?
  • Asset inventory
  • Adversary modelling
  • Attack trees
  • Economic threats
  • Mitigation plan
  • Living model
Which technologies are used?
Solidity, Foundry, OpenZeppelin, MPC Cryptography, OWASP, Prometheus — chosen to fit your stack and constraints.
How does the process work?
Scope → Threat modelling → Review & testing → Remediation → Operate.
What affects the cost?
  • Contract complexity and number of chains
  • Custody and wallet model
  • Independent audit scope
  • Indexing, analytics and back-office tooling
  • Compliance integrations (KYC, AML, Travel Rule)
  • Upgradeability and governance requirements
How long does it take?
A focused contract system or dApp MVP typically takes 8–14 weeks plus independent audit time; institutional platforms usually take 4–9 months.
How do I get started?
Share a short brief in the form below, book a 30-minute call or message us on WhatsApp. A senior engineer replies within one business day; NDA on request.

Capabilities

What we deliver

Asset inventory

What is at risk and where.

Adversary modelling

Capabilities and motivations.

Attack trees

Paths to compromise.

Economic threats

Manipulation and incentive attacks.

Mitigation plan

Prioritised controls.

Living model

Updated as the system evolves.

Architecture

Engineered right from day one

The layers we typically design for Web3 security engineering, adapted to your stack and partners.

  • Independent audits still matterOur work prepares for, and complements, third-party audits.
  • Beyond the contractMany losses come from keys, frontends and operations, not code.
  • Economic securityOracle manipulation and incentive attacks modelled explicitly.
  • Response readinessPausing, upgrades and communication planned before incidents.
Web3 Security Engineering · reference architecture
5Design
Threat modelsTrust assumptionsEconomic risk
4Code
Contract reviewStatic analysisFuzzing
3Keys
Custody designSigning policiesCeremonies
2Infrastructure
RPC & node hardeningFrontend integrityDNS
1Operations
MonitoringPause mechanismsIncident response

Delivery

How an engagement runs

  1. 1

    Scope

    Assets at risk, components and adversaries.

  2. 2

    Threat modelling

    Attack trees across contracts, keys, infrastructure and economics.

  3. 3

    Review & testing

    Code review, fuzzing, invariant testing and infrastructure checks.

  4. 4

    Remediation

    Prioritised findings and fixes, re-tested.

  5. 5

    Operate

    Monitoring, alerting and incident runbooks.

Security

Security built into delivery

Controls we apply by default on this kind of work — not a separate phase at the end.

Specification first

Roles, invariants and threat model documented before code.

Adversarial testing

Fuzz, invariant and fork tests plus static analysis on every change.

Key management

Admin keys in multisig or MPC with timelocks on sensitive actions.

Independent audit

Code prepared for — and we recommend — an external audit before mainnet value.

Dedicated team

Smart Contract Team

Audit-ready smart contract engineers for tokens, DeFi and tokenization.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

When should threat modelling happen?

Early in design, and again before audits and major upgrades.

Who participates?

Engineers, product owners and security specialists; we facilitate and document.

Is this the same as a smart contract audit?

No. We provide security engineering, internal review and audit preparation. For production contracts holding meaningful value, independent audits by specialist firms remain essential.

Do you monitor deployed contracts?

Yes. We set up on-chain monitoring and alerting for anomalous transactions, privileged function calls and parameter changes.

Next step

Discuss Your Blockchain Project.

Tell us about your Web3 threat modeling requirements — goals, timeline and constraints. We will reply with questions, an approach and next steps.

  • Senior engineer reads every enquiry
  • Reply within one business day
  • NDA on request

Prefer to talk first?

Book a 30-minute call, or message the nearest team on WhatsApp.

Book a Call

Your details are used only to reply to this enquiry.

Step 1 of 2Your details

Confidential. We reply within one business day. Privacy